Knowledge Base8029 Views

Aogami #1 vs Aogami #3 Which is batter

2 min read
Published
2026-04-19 14:22:22
Share

Between Aogami #1 (Blue #1) and Aogami #3 (Blue #3), Aogami #1 is the superior high-performance steel, while Aogami #3 is a niche choice focused on durability and ease of use.

For a primary chef's knife, Aogami #1 is almost always considered "better."

Quick Comparison: Aogami #1 vs. Aogami #3

Feature [3, 4, 5, 6, 7]

Aogami #1 (Blue #1)

Aogami #3 (Blue #3)

Carbon Content

High (1.25–1.35%)

Lower (0.80–0.90%)

Edge Retention

Superior. Best for long shifts.

Good, but needs more touch-ups.

Hardness (HRC)

63–65+

58–61

Toughness

Brittle; requires care.

Very High. Hard to chip.

Sharpening

Takes time but reaches a "laser" edge.

Very Easy. Fast feedback.

Price

Premium.

Budget-friendly.


Detailed Analysis

Why Aogami #1 is "Better" (Performance)

  • Edge Life: With nearly 50% more carbon than #3, Aogami #1 creates a much larger volume of hard carbides. This means it can stay "shaving sharp" for much longer during heavy kitchen work.

  • Peak Sharpness: Because it can be hardened significantly more, it supports a much thinner, more acute edge angle. This allows the knife to glide through food with less resistance.

Why Aogami #3 is "Better" (Utility)

  • Resilience: It is essentially a "workhorse" steel. Because it is less hard, it is much more "springy" and less likely to chip or crack if you accidentally twist the blade or hit a hard surface.

  • The Beginner's Carbon: If you are transitioning from soft Western stainless steel knives, Aogami #3 is a safer entry point into Japanese carbon steel because it isn't as fragile as the #1 grade.

The Verdict

  • Choose Aogami #1 if you want a professional-grade tool and you are confident in your knife skills. It is the better choice for Gyutos (chef's knives) and Yanagibas (slicers).

  • Choose Aogami #3 if you want a durable, low-stress carbon steel knife for heavy-duty tasks or if you are on a strict budget.

ARTICLE EVALUATION

What is your rating for this article?

Rated: 4.9 / 5.0